Cramer

Cramer v. Dudek

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 1, 202524-1768California1,020 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 1 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL G. CRAMER, No. 24-1768 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:22-cv-01644-BAT v.

MEMORANDUM*

LELAND DUDEK, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Brian Tsuchida, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 28, 2025** Seattle, Washington

Before: McKEOWN, GOULD, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Michael Cramer appeals from the district court order affirming the agency’s

denial of disability insurance benefits between June 28 and December 31, 2013.

We have jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). This appeal concerns the third of three Administrative Law Judge (ALJ)

decisions.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.