Velasquez

Velasquez v. Dudek

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 1, 202524-2589California643 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 1 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MELONY DAWN VELASQUEZ, No. 24-2589 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 1:23-cv-00066-CWD v.

MEMORANDUM*

LELAND DUDEK, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho Candy W. Dale, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 27, 2025** Seattle, Washington

Before: McKEOWN, GOULD, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Melony Velasquez appeals from the district court’s judgment affirming the

Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of her applications for disability

insurance benefits and supplemental security income. “We review de novo the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). district court’s order affirming the [Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ)] denial of

social security…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.