People v. Tucker CA4/2

statement of facts, a statement of the case, and requesting that we independently review

the record. Without suggesting any error occurred, counsel listed as an issue for our

potential review: whether defendant’s inculpatory statements were obtained in violation

of Miranda v. Arizona (1966) 384 U.S. 436. Defendant did not respond to notice of his

opportunity to file a supplemental brief.

Pursuant to People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, we have independently

reviewed the record for potential error. We are satisfied that defendant’s attorney has

fully complied with the responsibilities of counsel and no arguable issue exists. (Id. at

p. 126; People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d at pp. 441-442.)

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

MILLER

Acting P. J.

We concur:

CODRINGTON

J.

MENETREZ

J.

3