Kirsch

Kirsch v. Santa Barbara County Civil Service Com. CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 1, 2025B333011California3,126 words

Opinion

Opinion

Baltodano, J.

Filed 4/1/25 Kirsch v. Santa Barbara County Civil Service Com. CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

ROBERT KIRSCH, 2d Crim. No. B333011 (Super. Ct. No. 22CV00655) Plaintiff and Appellant, (Santa Barbara County)

v.

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY

CIVIL SERVICE

COMMISSION,

Defendant and Respondent;

COUNTY OF SANTA

BARBARA et al.,

Real Parties in Interest and Respondents.

The Santa Barbara County Sheriff’s Office (Department) terminated Robert Kirsch’s employment as a custody deputy because he submitted several inaccurate timesheets that overstated his hours worked. The Santa Barbara County Civil Service Commission (Commission) upheld his termination. Kirsch appeals from the trial court’s denial of his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.