Art Reproductive Center v. Hill CA2/3
Opinion
Opinion
Adams, J.
Filed 4/1/25 Art Reproductive Center v. Hill CA2/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
ART REPRODUCTIVE CENTER, B332700
INC., et al., (Los Angeles County Plaintiffs and Appellants, Super. Ct. No. 18STCV08895)
v.
DAVID HILL, Ph.D., et al.,
Defendants and Respondents.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Kevin C. Brazile, Judge. Affirmed. Ross and Peter W. Ross for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Sauer & Wagner, Gerald L. Sauer and Gregory P. Barchie for Defendants and Respondents. ‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗ Plaintiffs and appellants ART Reproductive Center, Inc. (ART) and Advanced Reproductive Technologies of Santa Barbara, LLC (ART SB; together, the ART parties) appeal from…