People v. Millsap CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 28, 2025A169533California2,007 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/28/25 P. v. Millsap CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publi- cation or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or or- dered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A169533

v. PAMELA FAYE MILLSAP, (Humboldt County Super. Ct. No. CR2000832) Defendant and Appellant.

After appellant Pamela Faye Millsap was convicted of child abuse, the trial court denied her request to dismiss two sentencing enhancements under Penal Code section 1385.1 She contends the trial court failed to accord proper weight to statutory mitigating factors. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

I. The Shooting

In early 2020, appellant Pamela Millsap lived with her then-partner, their 10-year-old daughter Jane Doe (Jane), and appellant’s 17-year-old son Christopher Millsap (Christopher).2 Christopher had…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.