People v. Dunham CA1/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 28, 2025A170566California946 words

Opinion

Opinion

Chou, J.

Filed 3/28/25 P. v. Dunham CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

THE PEOPLE,

A170566

Plaintiff and Respondent, v. (Del Norte County Super. Ct. No. CRF 22-9071)

LINDSEY DUNHAM,

Defendant and Appellant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

Defendant Lindsey Dunham appeals following her plea of guilty to one count of theft by a public officer under Penal Code section 424, subdivision (a).2 The trial court found the plea agreement to be in the interests of justice and sentenced her to a stipulated maximum term of two years in state prison. Dunham’s appointed counsel on appeal filed a brief pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende), and Dunham did not file a supplemental brief. Having conducted an independent review…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.