Krug

Krug v. Board of Trustees of the Cal. State Univ.

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 1, 2025B320588ACalifornia9,208 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kim, J.

BACKGROUND

The CSU system is a “state agency . . . in the field of public higher education which is charged with the management, administration, and control of the State College System of California.” (Cal. Const., art. XX, § 23; see Ed. Code, §§ 66600 [creating CSU’s board of trustees]; 89000 et seq. [governing CSU].) The Legislature has conferred on CSU a variety of powers, including the power to “prescribe policies and procedures for the acquisition of services, facilities, materials, goods, supplies, or equipment.” (Ed. Code, § 89036, subd. (a)(2).) In March 2020, CSU directed its teachers to begin teaching classes remotely. Krug did so but was denied access to his workplace office to retrieve his CSU-provided computer and printer. He absorbed the cost for replacing these items himself, then asked for reimbursement, which the school denied. CSU 1 took the position that Labor Code section 2802, subdivision (a), which obligates an employer to “indemnify [an] employee for all necessary expenditures . . . incurred . . . in direct consequence of the discharge of his or her duties,” did not apply to the school because such application would infringe on its sovereign powers as a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.