In re D.B.

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 9, 2013A135254MCalifornia6,425 words

Opinion

Opinion

Humes, J.

Filed 8/9/13 (unmodified opn. attached)

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

In re D.B. et al., Persons Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law.

SAN FRANCISCO HUMAN SERVICES A135254

AGENCY, (San Francisco County Super. Ct. No. JD08-3153 C-E) Plaintiff and Respondent, ORDER MODIFYING OPINION v. AND DENYING REHEARING [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT] A.G. et al., Defendants and Appellants.

BY THE COURT:

The opinion that was filed July 11, 2013, is modified as follows: 1. Delete the second sentence of the third paragraph of section II.B. and replace it with “Here, the juvenile court granted parental visitation following termination of reunification services at the 18-month review hearing, which is governed by section 366.22.” 2. At the end of the sixth paragraph of section II.B., add the following two- paragraph footnote 7: “In a petition for rehearing, father (joined by mother) again argues we should review the juvenile court‟s order for substantial evidence, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.