22:I[98912,["/_next/static/chunks/0asocxi83kb~5.js","/_next/static/chunks/0n4z.7yu76je-.js","/_next/static/chunks/0eyt_ou8dj52g.js","/_next/static/chunks/01bcia3bjqt9z.js","/_next/static/chunks/15egrlmmf_yst.js"],"CaseDetailGate"] 23:T471,UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA HUNG DUONG NGUON, Case No. 2:24-cv-02297-PA (SK) Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT Vv. AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT RESPONDENT’S JAMES S. HILL, Warden, MOTION TO DISMISS PETITION Respondent. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the filed Report and Recommendation to grant Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss Habeas Petition and any relevant records as needed. Because the time for objections has passed with none filed, the Court need not review de novo the findings and conclusions in the Report and Recommendation. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 154 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc). THEREFORE, the Court accepts the Report and Recommendation and orders that Respondent’s motion to dismiss the first amended petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be granted. Judgment will accordingly be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: March 31, 2025 [te PERCY ANI|ERSON United States District Judge24:T4a5,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HUNG DUONG NGUON, Case No. 2:24-cv-02297-PA (SK) Petitioner, ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT Vv. AND RECOMMENDATION TO

GRANT RESPONDENT’S

JAMES S. HILL, Warden, MOTION TO DISMISS PETITION Respondent.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the filed Report and Recommendation to grant Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss Habeas Petition and any relevant records as needed. Because the time for objections has passed with none filed, the Court need not review de novo the findings and conclusions in the Report and Recommendation. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 154 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc). THEREFORE, the Court accepts the Report and Recommendation and orders that Respondent’s motion to dismiss the first amended petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be granted. Judgment will accordingly be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: March 31, 2025 [te

PERCY ANI|ERSON

United States District Judge