Littlefield

Littlefield v. Cty. of Humboldt

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 25, 2013A135628California4,889 words

Opinion

Opinion

Siggins, J.

BACKGROUND

The facts are largely undisputed. Humboldt County Sheriff‟s deputies, assisted by CAMP (Campaign Against Marijuana Planting) agents, conducted open field marijuana eradication operations in a remote area of Humboldt County. Following aerial surveillance, deputies and CAMP agents entered a garden that contained 118 marijuana

1 plants ranging from three to eight feet tall with an average diameter of six to seven feet. The flowering plants were heavily laden with buds. A loaded rifle with an attached 50 round “banana clip” was found in a small tent inside the garden. Four medical marijuana recommendations written by Dr. Norman Bensky, for Sylvia Littlefield, Timothy Littlefield, Roscoe Littlefield, and Jeffrey Libertini, were posted on the front gate and inside the garden. The recommendations for Sylvia, Timothy and Roscoe Littlefield indicated the use of up to two ounces of cannabis per day, the equivalent of 45.6 pounds per year. The recommendation for Libertini was not issued by Dr. Bensky, and did not identify a dose or the ailment or symptoms to be treated with cannabis. Sylvia‟s recommendation specified it was for degenerative joint disease and glaucoma, Roscoe‟s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.