Hosey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GARY LEE BEAVERS, Case No. 1:21-cv-00650-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

v. (Doc. Nos. 48, 50) OFFICER HOSEY, OFFICER MENDOZA, and OFFICER ESPINOSA, 15 Defendants. 16 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Gary Lee Beaver’s motion for reconsideration filed February 24, 2025. (Doc. Nos. 48, 50). Plaintiff seeks reconsideration of the Court’s January 29, 2025 Order granting Defendants’ exhaustion-based motion for summary judgment as to Defendants Mendoza and Espinosa. Defendants filed an Opposition to the Motion on March 17, 2025. (Doc. No. 50). Because Plaintiff filed the motion within 28 days of the final judgment being challenged, the Court construes the Motion as made pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) to modify the judgment. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies the Motion. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) permits a party to move a court to…