Gu

(PC) Gosztyla v. Gu

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 1, 20251:22-cv-00610California10,389 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 CHANTELL GOSZTYLA, Case No. 1:22-cv-00610-KES-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT:

v.

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE DR.

WEI GU, et al., FEINBERG’S EXPERT OPINION BE DENIED; and Defendants.

DEFENDANT GU’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT BE GRANTED.

(ECF No. 57; ECF No. 64) OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

THIRTY DAYS

18 Plaintiff Chantell Gosztyla is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case proceeds on Plaintiff’s claim that 20 her primary care provider, Defendant Wei Gu, M.D. (“Dr. Gu”), was deliberately indifferent to 21 her serious medical need for chiropractic manipulative therapy in violation of the Eighth 22 Amendment. (ECF No. 12). Plaintiff sues Dr. Gu in his official and individual capacities, and 23 seeks monetary damages as well as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.