Kelso
(PC) Puckett v. Kelso
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DURRELL ANTHONY PUCKETT, Case No. 1:23-cv-00054-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER FINDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
MOOTAND DENYING THE MOTION
v. (Doc. No. 100) BARAONA, T. CAMPBELL, HERNANDEZ and WHITE, 15 Defendants. 16 17 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion requesting the Court to lift the stay and direct Defendants to file a response to his pending motion for summary judgment. (Doc. No. 100 at 1). Plaintiff alternatively asks the Court to enter a default for Defendants’ failure to respond to his motion for summary judgment. (Id. at 2). The Court did not stay this case, but did afford Defendants extensions of time to respond to Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. (Doc. Nos. 87, 121, 124). Defendants’ response to Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment was due on March 25, 2025. (Doc. No. 124). On March 25, 2025, Defendants timely filed an opposition to Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. (Doc. No. 126). Thus, Defendants have timely…