Dorado

Dorado v. Stephan

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 1, 20253:25-cv-00083California1,174 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL DORADO, Case No.: 25-cv-0083-WQH (SBC)

CDCR #BN-7728,

Plaintiff, 13 vs. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

EXTENSION OF TIME TO AMEND

SUMMER STEPHAN, San Diego District 15 Attorney; JESSICA COTO, Deputy San Diego District Attorney; KATHERINE CRUMB, San Diego Police Detective; 17 NANCY KARMELECH, Accuser; and CHARLES ROGERS, Superior Court Judge, 19 Defendants. 20 21 HAYES, Judge: 22 On January 7, 2025, Plaintiff Daniel Dorado, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed 23 a civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, accompanied by a Motion to Proceed 24 In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”). (ECF Nos. 1-2.) Plaintiff alleged that Defendants San Diego 25 County District Attorney Summer Stephan, San Diego County Deputy District Attorney 26 Jessica Coto, San Diego County Superior Court Judge Charles Rogers, San Diego Police 27 Detective Katherine Crumb, and Nancy Karmelech, an “accuser,” were all involved in his 28 San Diego County Superior Court criminal prosecution which resulted in his December 2019…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.