Camargo Alejo v. Vista Detention Facility

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 1, 20253:25-cv-00258California670 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Jose CAMARGO ALEJO, Case No.: 3:25-cv-0258-AGS-JLB

Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL

vs. ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE (ECF 1) AND DENYING MOTION VISTA DETENTION FACILITY, et al.,

TO PROCEED IN FORMA

Defendants. PAUPERIS (ECF 2) 8 Plaintiff Jose Camargo Alejo, a detainee representing himself, has filed a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (ECF 1), along with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF 2). For the reasons discussed below, the Court denies plaintiff’s IFP motion and dismisses the action without prejudice. IFP MOTION Typically, parties instituting any civil action in a United States district court must pay filing fees of $405.1 See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed without payment of fees at the time of filing only if the court grants the plaintiff leave to proceed. IFP. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a); see also Hymas v. U.S. Dep’t of the Interior, 73 F.4th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.