Smith v. St. Jude Medical

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 19, 2013A135338California4,564 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/21/13 Certified for publication 6/19/13 (order attached)

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

AUDREY SMITH et al.,

Plaintiffs and Appellants,

A135338

v. (Alameda County ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC. Super. Ct. No. RG09470457) et al.,

Defendants and Respondents. ____________________________________/

Plaintiffs are the five adult children and mother of the decedent, Patricia Amonoo, who died following cardiac pacemaker surgery in 2008. Plaintiffs sued St. Jude Medical, Inc. (St. Jude), Jeremy Kosel (collectively, defendants), and others involved in the surgery for, among other things, wrongful death as a result of defendants‟ negligence. The trial court granted St. Jude‟s motion for summary judgment, concluding defendants did not owe Amonoo a duty of care “with respect to the acts or omissions that allegedly caused her injury and death” and that plaintiffs “lack[ed] evidence that any acts or omissions by Kosel breached his duty of care under the circumstances or proximately caused the injury or death.” Plaintiffs appeal. They contend the court erred by granting summary judgment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.