Brooks

Brooks v. McDowell

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20254:22-cv-06334California646 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MARCEL BROOKS, Case No. 22-cv-06334-JST

Petitioner,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL; DENYING

v. CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

CHRISTOPHER PIERCE, Respondent.

12 Petitioner Marcel Brooks, an inmate at Ironwood State Prison, filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging a conviction from Alameda County Superior Court. ECF Nos. 1, 5. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DISMISSES the petition for failure to exhaust state court remedies, and DENIES a certificate of appealability. DISCUSSION The petition states the following cognizable claim for federal habeas relief: trial counsel was ineffective because he failed to review all the discovery, was unaware of exculpatory text messages, and did not hire a private investigator to interview two key witnesses who would have proven Petitioner’s innocence. ECF Nos. 5, 14. On February 10, 2025, the Court granted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.