Gustin

Gustin v. PHH Mortgage Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 1, 20254:24-cv-02917California1,486 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BRANDON LEE GUSTIN, Case No. 24-cv-02917-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

v.

PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Defendant.

12 On November 19, 2024, the Court granted Defendant PHH Mortgage Corporation’s motion to dismiss pro se Plaintiff Brandon Gustin’s complaint. Dkt. No. 28. The Court granted Plaintiff leave to amend his complaint by December 24, 2024. Id. at 5. Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint. On January 27, 2024, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause by February 10, 2025, why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Dkt. No. 29. Plaintiff failed to respond by the deadline and has not filed any response as of the date of this order. For the reasons set forth below, this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed his complaint against Defendant PHH Mortgage Corporation in May 2024. See Dkt. No. 1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.