Yost

(PS) Halajian v. Yost

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 1, 20251:24-cv-00826California677 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BARRY STUART HALAJIAN, Case No.: 1:24-cv-00826 JLT SKO

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS; GRANTING

vs. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND

KELLY YOST, in his Official and Private Capacity, the CITY OF FRESNO, A Municipal (Docs. 32, 35, 36) Corporation, DOES 1-20 inclusive,

Defendants.

17 Barry Halajian initiated this action against Kelly Yost and the City of Fresno (collectively, “Defendants”) in which he raises various claims. (Doc. 1.) After the Court dismissed the complaint with leave to amend (Doc. 28), he filed a First Amended Complaint. (Doc. 29) Defendants moved to dismiss the FAC (Doc. 32), and Plaintiff did not file an opposition to the motion. The magistrate judge evaluated the motion and recommended it be granted and that Defendants’ motion for a more definite statement and to strike be denied as moot. (Doc. 35.) The magistrate judge found that Plaintiff failed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.