Welpath

(PC) Rosner v. Welpath

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 1, 20251:24-cv-01145California2,934 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JESSIE ROSNER, No. 1:24-cv-01145-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE

v. TO THIS ACTION WELLPATH, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION

Defendants. (ECF No. 14)

17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42

U.S.C. § 1983.

19 Plaintiff’s complaint in this action was filed on September 26, 2024. (ECF No. 1.) 20 On October 31, 2024, the Court screened the complaint, found that Plaintiff failed to state a 21 cognizable claim for relief, and granted Plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. (ECF 22 No. 7.) 23 Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint or otherwise respond to the October 31, 2024 24 order. Therefore, on January 7, 2025, the Court issued an order for Plaintiff to show cause why 25 the action should not be dismissed. (ECF No. 11.) On January 23, 2025, Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.