(PC) Seay v. California Department of Corrections/Rehabilitation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONALD L. SEAY, No. 1:25-cv-000178-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT
TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT
v. JUDGE TO THIS ACTION CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION CORRECTIONS/REHABILITATION, et RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF al., ACTION AS DUPLICATIVE (ECF No. 8) Defendants. 17 18 19 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 25, 2025, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and ordered Plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be dismissed as duplicative of Seay v. CDCR, et al., Case No. 1:25-cv-00177-SAB (PC). Plaintiff has failed to file a response to the order to show cause and the time to do so has passed. Accordingly, dismissal of the action as duplicative is warranted. I. SCREENING…