Carl Zeiss X-Ray Microscopy, Inc. v. Sigray, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 1, 20255:21-cv-01129California2,430 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 CARL ZEISS X-RAY MICROSCOPY, Case No. 21-cv-01129-EJD

INC.,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR Plaintiff, LEAVE TO SERVE SUPPLEMENTAL EXPERT REPORTS v. Re: ECF No. 250

SIGRAY, INC.,

12 Defendant. 13 Plaintiff Carl Zeiss X-Ray Microscopy, Inc. (“Zeiss”) brought this patent infringement and trade secret misappropriation case against Sigray, Inc. (“Sigray”). Zeiss alleges that Sigray misappropriated trade secrets generally related to x-ray microscopy and infringes U.S. Patent No. 7,057,187 (the “’187 Patent”) and U.S. Patent No. 7,400,704 (“’704 Patent”). Before the Court is Zeiss’s motion for leave to serve supplemental expert reports. Zeiss’s Mot. for Leave to Serve Suppl. Expert Reports (“Mot.”), ECF No. 250. For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS Zeiss’s motion for leave. I. BACKGROUND This case was filed more than…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.