Marfil

(PC) Collins v. Marfil

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 1, 20252:24-cv-01091California1,186 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BOBBY LEE COLLINS 2:24-cv-1091-CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER J. MARFIL, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Bobby Collins, a state prisoner, proceeds in forma pauperis and without counsel. This matter was referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff’s first amended complaint (ECF No. 14)1 is before the court for screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if a prisoner has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2). In the first amended complaint, plaintiff alleges he signed up to use the ADA disability caption phone, but the three correctional officers at New Folsom State Prison named as

1 Portions of plaintiff’s first amended complaint are difficult to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.