(PS) Mallory v. County of Sacramento
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JASON MALLORY, No. 2:24-cv-3663 DJC AC PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER and COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RANDHIR GANDHI, ROGER
LEVENSON and ALDRIDGE PITE, Defendants. 17 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was accordingly referred to the undersigned by E.D. Cal. 302(c)(21). Plaintiff previously filed a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) and submitted the affidavit required by that statute. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). The motion to proceed IFP was granted, and pursuant to the screening process accompanying IFP status, the first amended complaint was rejected with leave to amend. Plaintiff now filed a motion to seal the case (ECF No. 10) and a Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 12). For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned recommends the Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) be dismissed and that this case be closed. The undersigned DENIES the…