Munoz-Munoz

United States v. Munoz-Munoz

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 2, 202523-4455California1,215 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 2 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-4455 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:21-CR-00501-DSF-2 v.

MEMORANDUM*

JORGE MUÑOZ-MUÑOZ,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dale S. Fischer, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 27, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: TASHIMA, NGUYEN, and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges.

Jorge Muñoz-Muñoz appeals his 110-month sentence and the district court’s

denial of his request for a mitigating role reduction under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and 3742. “When reviewing sentencing

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). decisions, we review the district court’s identification of the relevant legal standard

de novo, its factual…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.