Biggs

United States v. Biggs

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 2, 202524-2091California923 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 2 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-2091 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 1:22-cr-00130-SPW-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

ROBERT EARL BIGGS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 28, 2025** Seattle, Washington

Before: McKEOWN, GOULD, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Robert Earl Biggs appeals from the district court’s denial of his motion to

suppress statements he made to police and evidence seized from his hotel room,

which he argues were obtained in violation of the Fourth and Fifth Amendments.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We review the district court’s conclusions of law regarding a motion to suppress de

novo, and its factual determinations for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.