Wade

Wade v. Ports America Management Corp.

Good Law
160 Cal. Rptr. 3d 482·2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 615·218 Cal. App. 4th 648·2013 WL 3963965·196 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2496
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 2, 2013B238224California4,366 words

Opinion

Opinion

Manella, J.

INTRODUCTION

Camargo v. California Portland Cement Co. (2001) 86 Cal.App.4th 995 [ 103 Cal.Rptr.2d 841 ] (Camargo) held that a labor arbitration pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement (CBA) has no preclusive effect on a claim pursuant to the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), Government Code section 12940 et seq., unless the parties expressly agreed to arbitrate FEHA claims. (Camargo, at p. 1008.) On appeal, Calvin Wade contends this holding should be extended to common law claims related to the FEHA, such as a claim for wrongful termination in violation of public policy. We disagree, as there is no comprehensive statutory scheme applicable to FEHA-related common law claims comparable to the FEHA. In the alternative, appellant contends the arbitration had no preclusive effect, as it did not address his racial discrimination claim. We conclude the arbitration encompassed that claim. Accordingly, we affirm the grant of a summary judgment in favor of respondents Marine Terminals Corporation and Ports America Management Corporation (collectively MTC) on appellant’s cause of action for wrongful termination in violation of public policy.

FACTUAL AND…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.