King

King v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 2, 202524-4034California689 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 2 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STACEY KING, No. 24-4034 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:20-cv-00055-ART-NJK v. MEMORANDUM*

CITY OF LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN

POLICE DEPARTMENT; ALEJANDRA

ZAMBRANO; LARRY HADFIELD; JOE

LOMBARDO,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Anne R. Traum, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 31, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: HURWITZ, KOH, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Stacey King appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment

order and its imposition of discovery sanctions. Because the parties are familiar

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). with the facts, we do not recount them here, except as necessary to provide…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.