King
King v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 2, 202524-4034California689 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 2 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
STACEY KING, No. 24-4034 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:20-cv-00055-ART-NJK v. MEMORANDUM*
CITY OF LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN
POLICE DEPARTMENT; ALEJANDRA
ZAMBRANO; LARRY HADFIELD; JOE
LOMBARDO,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Anne R. Traum, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 31, 2025** San Francisco, California
Before: HURWITZ, KOH, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.
Stacey King appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment
order and its imposition of discovery sanctions. Because the parties are familiar
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). with the facts, we do not recount them here, except as necessary to provide…