Davidson

Davidson v. Dudek

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 2, 202524-4239California895 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 2 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JACK DAVIDSON, No. 24-4239 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 2:23-cv-01870-DMC v.

MEMORANDUM*

LELAND DUDEK, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dennis M. Cota, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 31, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: HURWITZ, KOH, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

Jack Davidson appeals a district court judgment affirming a decision of the

Social Security Commissioner denying an application for disability insurance

benefits. Exercising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and reviewing de novo, see

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). White v. Kijakazi, 44 F.4th 828, 833 (9th Cir. 2022), we affirm.

1. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.