Fiduciary Trust International v. Superior Court

Good Law
160 Cal. Rptr. 3d 216·2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 606·218 Cal. App. 4th 465·2013 WL 3942592
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 31, 2013B247441California9,824 words

Opinion

Opinion

Zelon, J.

INTRODUCTION

In 1992, Raymond Sandler, then an attorney at Sandler & Rosen, drafted wills for Willet Brown and his wife Betty Brown. Willet’s will established a marital trust that was expected to generate several million dollars in annual income. The will named Betty as the marital trust’s income beneficiary for life; upon her death, the principal of the trust was to be transferred into an “Exemption Equivalent Trust” that would benefit each of Willet’s four children. Betty’s will, in turn, left a large majority of her estate to the Exemption Equivalent Trust. After Willet died, Betty revoked the will that Sandler had prepared and drafted a new instrument transferring the large majority of her assets to a trust that was to benefit her daughter.

Following Betty’s death in 2011, a dispute arose between her personal representative—petitioner Fiduciary Trust International of California—and the marital trust trustees regarding whether the terms of Willet’s will required the trust to pay approximately $27 million in estate and inheritance taxes that were due on Betty’s assets. Fiduciary Trust filed a motion to disqualify Sandler & Rosen, arguing that the firm was barred from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.