Martinez

(PC) Stevens v. Martinez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 2, 20251:21-cv-01144California696 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LYRALISA LAVENA STEVENS, Case No. 1:21-cv-01144-JLT-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO VACATE THE DEADLINE

v. FOR FILING DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS

PENDING RESOLUTION OF MOTION

C. MARTINEZ, FOR TERMINATING SANCTIONS

Defendant. (Doc. 49)

Plaintiff Lyralisa Lavena Stevens is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds against Defendants Martinez and Peterson for violations of Plaintiff’s constitutional rights. I. BACKGROUND The Court issued its Discovery and Scheduling Order on April 1, 2024. (Doc. 37.) On December 17, 2024, the Court issued its Order Granting Defendant Peterson’s Motion to Compel. (Doc. 45.) Plaintiff was ordered to “respond to Peterson’s Request for Production No. 4, no later than 21 days from the date of service of this order, by providing responsive documents, or a written response indicating she…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.