Pal Gill Trucking, Inc. v. Lancashire Cargo Consortium

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 2, 20251:24-cv-00770California1,058 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 PAL GILL TRUCKING INC., Case No. 1:24-cv-00770-EPG Plaintiff, ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF PAL GILL

TRUCKING’S MOTION TO AMEND OR

v. ALTER THE JUDGMENT LANCASHIRE CARGO CONSORTIUM, (ECF No. 22) Defendant. 15 I. INTRODUCTION On March 31, 2025, Pal Gill Trucking, Inc., (“Plaintiff”) filed Plaintiff’s Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion to Amend or Alter Judgment under Rule 59 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 22). Plaintiff asks the Court to amend its judgment, which was entered on March 3, 2025 (ECF No. 20), after the Court granted Defendant Lancashire 20 Cargo Consortium’s Motion to Dismiss, dismissing Plaintiff’s complaint with prejudice. (ECF 21 No. 19). 22 Plaintiff’s motion to amend or alter judgment is now before the Court. For the reasons 23 stated below, the motion will be denied.1

II. BACKGROUND

25 Plaintiff filed its complaint on July 2, 2024. (ECF No. 1). Plaintiff’s complaint asserts 26…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.