Christiansen

The People v. Christiansen

Bad Law
157 Cal. Rptr. 3d 451·2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 433·216 Cal. App. 4th 1181·2013 WL 2368545
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 31, 2013B238361, B240572California3,519 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rothschild, J.

Karen Christiansen was charged with four counts of conflict of interest in violation of Government Code section 1090, which generally prohibits public officials from being financially interested in contracts they make in their official capacity. A jury convicted Christiansen on all counts, and the trial court sentenced her to four years four months in prison and ordered her to pay restitution of approximately $3.5 million.

On appeal, Christiansen argues on numerous grounds that her convictions must be reversed. We agree. Because Christiansen was not a member, officer, or employee of the relevant public body, section 1090 does not apply to her. We therefore reverse her convictions, vacate her sentence and the restitution award, and direct the superior court to dismiss all charges against her.

BACKGROUND

Section 1090 provides as follows: “Members of the Legislature, state, county, district, judicial district, and city officers or employees shall not be financially interested in any contract made by them in their official capacity, or by any body or board of which they are members.” Violation of section 1090 is a crime punishable by a fine of not more than $1,000 or by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.