Spectrum Scientifics, LLC v. Celestron Acquisition, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 2, 20255:20-cv-03642California2,488 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 IN RE TELESCOPES ANTITRUST Case No. 5:20-cv-03642-EJD

LITIGATION

ORDER DENYING MOTION

REQUESTING FINANCIAL

ASSURANCES AND ASSET

INFORMATION

11 Re: Dkt. No. 656 Before the Court is DPPs’ Motion Requesting Financial Assurance and Asset Information. Mot., ECF No. 656. This motion is fully briefed. Opp’n, ECF No. 658; Reply, ECF No. 661. Upon careful review of the relevant documents the Court finds this matter suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 7-1(b). For the reasons explained below, the Court DENIES DPPs’ motion. I. BACKGROUND The Court has summarized the factual allegations and procedural history of this case many times and need not repeat this background here. See, e.g., ECF Nos. 731, 596, 589, 539, 502, 173. For purposes of this motion, DPPs seek an order requiring that Defendants identify…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.