Pitts

Pitts v. Quest Diagnostic Clinical Laboratories, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 2, 20251:24-cv-01271California1,898 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TRACY PITTS, as Guardian Ad Litem for Case No. 1:24-cv-01271-JLT-HBK

MARY PITTS,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT T.A.M. Plaintiff, PROP. INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS CLAIM FOR PUNITIVE DAMAGES v. (Doc. No. 29) UNILAB CORPORATION d/b/a QUEST DIAGNOSTICS. and T.A.M. PROP. INC.,

16 Defendants, 17 UNILAB CORPORATION d/b/a QUEST DIAGNOSTICS,

Third-Party Plaintiff v.

T.A.M. PROP. LLC,

21 Third Party Defendant, 22 Pending before the Court is Defendant T.A.M. Prop. Inc.’s motion to dismiss filed on March 6, 2025. (Doc. No. 29, “Motion”). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), T.A.M. seeks dismissal of Plaintiff’s request for punitive damages. The parties consented to have the motion decided by a magistrate judge and the district court reassigned the motion to the undersigned for disposition. (Doc. Nos. 31, 32). For the reasons set forth below, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.