Bryan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 2:22-cv-01962-DJC-AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER MARK LINN BRYAN et al., Defendants. 15 Defendant Mark Linn Bryan has moved for leave to appeal this Court’s Orders denying his Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction (ECF No. 160) and Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Standing (ECF No. 171). (Mot. Interlocutory Appeal (ECF No. 173); see also Minute Order (ECF No. 161) (denying Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 160)); Minute Order (ECF No. 172) (denying Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 171).) Generally, a party may appeal only after final judgment. Romoland Sch. Dist. v. Inland Empire Energy Ctr., 548 F.3d 738, 747 (9th Cir. 2008). In narrow circumstances, however, a district court has authority to certify a question for interlocutory appeal before final judgment. See 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b); Couch v. Telescope, Inc., 611 F.3d 629, 633 (9th Cir. 2010). The party seeking…