Robert Leclair v. James Dzurenda

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 3, 202523-15334California694 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 3 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBERT LECLAIR, No. 23-15334

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:19-cv-00404-MMD-CLB v.

JAMES DZURENDA; et al., MEMORANDUM*

Defendants-Appellants,

and

CHARLES DANIELS; HAROLD

WICKHAM,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Miranda M. Du, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 1, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: HURWITZ, KOH, and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Robert LeClair, a Nevada state prisoner, claims in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action

that Nevada Department of Corrections (“NDOC”) employees (collectively

“Defendants”) violated the Eighth Amendment by denying him Hepatitis C (“Hep-

C”) treatment pursuant to NDOC Medical…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.