Corenbaum

Corenbaum v. Lampkin

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 13, 2013B236227MCalifornia11,361 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/13/13 (unmodified opn. attached)

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

JOHN CORENBAUM, B236227

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. NC054159) v.

DWIGHT ERIC LAMPKIN, ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

[NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT] Defendant and Appellant.

CHARLES CARTER et al., B237871

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. NC054349) v.

DWIGHT ERIC LAMPKIN,

Defendant and Appellant.

BY THE COURT:

The opinion filed in this matter on April 30, 2013, is hereby modified in the

following manner:

Page 21: The last sentence of footnote 12 is hereby deleted and replaced with the

following:

1 As the circumstance is not presented by the record before us, we do not reach or

consider the issues that might arise in the event that a defendant seeks to introduce

evidence that the reasonable value of past medical services was less than the amount

accepted by the medical providers as full payment.

[NO CHANGE IN…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.