Dudek

Williams v. Dudek

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 3, 202524-2680California381 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 3 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RACHEL WILLIAMS,

No. 24-2680 Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. 3:23-cv-00836-CL v.

MEMORANDUM*

LELAND DUDEK,

Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Mark D. Clarke, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 1, 2025** Portland, Oregon

Before: BYBEE, LEE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Rachel Williams appeals the district court’s judgment affirming the decision

of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (SSA) denying her claim

for benefits. The SSA Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) concluded that Williams

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). was not disabled, and the district court affirmed. We review the factual

determinations of SSA for substantial evidence.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.