Uquiche-Nahui
Uquiche-Nahui v. Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 3, 202524-2960California1,869 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
APR 3 2025
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JULIO CESAR UQUICHE-NAHUI; No. 24-2960
MIRIAM JUDITH GONZALES-
BONIFACIO; J.E.U.G., Agency Nos.
A240-839-508
Petitioners, A240-839-509
A240-839-510
v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted March 6, 2025** Pasadena, California
Before: TALLMAN, IKUTA, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges. Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge CHRISTEN.
Julio Cesar Uquiche-Nahui, Miriam Judith Gonzales-Bonifacio, and
J.E.U.G., natives and citizens of Peru, petition for review of an order from the
Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing their appeal of a final order of
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). removal issued by an immigration judge…