Uquiche-Nahui

Uquiche-Nahui v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 3, 202524-2960California1,869 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

APR 3 2025

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JULIO CESAR UQUICHE-NAHUI; No. 24-2960

MIRIAM JUDITH GONZALES-

BONIFACIO; J.E.U.G., Agency Nos.

A240-839-508

Petitioners, A240-839-509

A240-839-510

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 6, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: TALLMAN, IKUTA, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges. Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge CHRISTEN.

Julio Cesar Uquiche-Nahui, Miriam Judith Gonzales-Bonifacio, and

J.E.U.G., natives and citizens of Peru, petition for review of an order from the

Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing their appeal of a final order of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). removal issued by an immigration judge…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.