Bondi

Rodas De Vasquez v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 3, 202524-2561California410 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 3 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SONIA ELIZABETH RODAS DE No. 24-2561 VASQUEZ; DAVID ELEAZAR Agency Nos.

VASQUEZ RODAS; JORGE ENRIQUE A216-274-920

VASQUEZ RODAS, A216-274-921

A216-274-922

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 1, 2025** Pasadena, California

Before: M. SMITH and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges, and MAGNUS-STINSON, District Judge.***

Petitioners Sonia Elizabeth Rodas De Vasquez (“De Vasquez”) and her two

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Jane Magnus-Stinson, United States District Judge for the Southern District of Indiana,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.