Felipes

Felipes v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 3, 202523-3236California675 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 3 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FERNANDO FELIPES; FABIANE No. 23-3236 MIRANDA SILVA; FERNANDO KAHIK Agency Nos.

BRIAN SILVA FELIPES; YANNE SILVA A220-248-558

FELIPES, A220-248-559

A220-248-560

Petitioners,

A220-248-561

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 1, 2025** Portland, Oregon

Before: BYBEE, LEE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Petitioners Fernando Felipes, his wife, and his two minor children petition for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision dismissing their appeal

of the immigration judge’s (IJ) denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and relief

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.