Bautista-Paz

Bautista-Paz v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 3, 202523-3938California572 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 3 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RUBEN BAUTISTA-PAZ, No. 23-3938 Agency No. Petitioner, A206-547-941 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 1, 2025** Portland, Oregon

Before: BYBEE, LEE, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Ruben Bautista-Paz, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of a

Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for cancellation of

removal because he failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). qualifying relative. “[T]he application of the exceptional and extremely unusual

hardship…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.