People v. Tran CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 3, 2025C101353California3,228 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 4/3/25 P. v. Tran CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

THE PEOPLE, C101353

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 95F06726)

v.

TIEN DUC TRAN,

Defendant and Appellant.

In 1996, the prosecution charged defendant Tien Duc Tran with murdering two people. The trial court did not instruct the jury on either the felony-murder rule or the natural and probable consequences doctrine. The jury found defendant guilty of first degree murder of one victim and second degree murder of the other victim.

1 In 2022, defendant filed a petition seeking to have his second degree murder conviction vacated pursuant to Penal Code1 section 1172.6. The trial court denied the petition, finding…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.