People v. Hurtado CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 3, 2025A167684California2,816 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fujisaki, J.

Filed 4/3/25 P. v. Hurtado CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A167684

v. NATHAN ANTHONY HURTADO, (Contra Costa County Super. Ct. No. 01-22-02139) Defendant and Appellant.

A jury found defendant Nathan Anthony Hurtado guilty of a number of offenses, including second degree burglary and vandalism. On appeal, he contends the trial court erred by instructing the jury with CALCRIM No. 376. He also contends insufficient evidence supports his conviction for felony vandalism. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The People charged defendant by information with second degree burglary (Pen. Code, § 4591); vandalism causing damage over $400 (§ 594, subd. (a)); receipt of stolen property with a value…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.