People v. Hurtado CA1/3
Opinion
Opinion
Fujisaki, J.
Filed 4/3/25 P. v. Hurtado CA1/
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent,
A167684
v. NATHAN ANTHONY HURTADO, (Contra Costa County Super. Ct. No. 01-22-02139) Defendant and Appellant.
A jury found defendant Nathan Anthony Hurtado guilty of a number of offenses, including second degree burglary and vandalism. On appeal, he contends the trial court erred by instructing the jury with CALCRIM No. 376. He also contends insufficient evidence supports his conviction for felony vandalism. We affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The People charged defendant by information with second degree burglary (Pen. Code, § 4591); vandalism causing damage over $400 (§ 594, subd. (a)); receipt of stolen property with a value…