Multani

Multani v. Witkin & Neal

Bad Law
155 Cal. Rptr. 3d 892·2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 347·215 Cal. App. 4th 1428·2013 WL 1818613
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 1, 2013B237295California11,144 words

Opinion

Opinion

Zelon, J.

INTRODUCTION

The Castle Green Homeowners Association notified Afshan and Rahim Multani that they were delinquent in paying their monthly assessment fees. After the Multanis disputed the debt, the association conducted a nonjudicial foreclosure sale of their condominium unit. The Multanis sued to set aside the foreclosure alleging irregularities in the sale notices and procedure. They further alleged that the association and its agents had committed tortious acts during the foreclosure process.

Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment or adjudication arguing that the court should dismiss the foreclosure claims because plaintiffs had actual knowledge of the foreclosure proceedings and failed to exercise their postsale right of redemption. Defendants also argued that plaintiffs’ tort claims were untimely and predicated on privileged conduct related to the foreclosure process. The court granted the motion.

We reverse the trial court’s dismissal of plaintiffs’ claims seeking to set aside the foreclosure sale, concluding that defendants failed to demonstrate that they notified the plaintiffs of their right of redemption as required by Code of Civil Procedure section…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.