Lopez

Mt. Hawley Insurance v. Lopez

Bad Law
156 Cal. Rptr. 3d 771·2013 Cal. App. LEXIS 346·215 Cal. App. 4th 1385·2013 WL 1818627
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 1, 2013B234082California18,406 words

Opinion

Opinion

Segal, J.

INTRODUCTION

Insurance Code section 533.5, subdivision (b), precludes insurers from providing a defense for certain kinds of claims. The statute provides: “No policy of insurance shall provide, or be construed to provide, any duty to defend . . . any claim in any criminal action or proceeding or in any action or proceeding brought pursuant to” California’s unfair competition law under Business and Professions Code sections 17200 and 17500 “in which the recovery of a fine, penalty, or restitution is sought by the Attorney General, any district attorney, any city prosecutor, or any county counsel, notwithstanding whether the exclusion or exception regarding the duty to defend this type of claim is expressly stated in the policy.” In Bodell v. Walbrook Ins. Co. (9th Cir. 1997) 119 F.3d 1411 (BodellI), the Ninth Circuit held that section 533.5, subdivision (b), applies to criminal actions brought by the four listed state and local agencies but does not apply to criminal actions brought by federal prosecutors. The dissenting judge in Bodell and the trial court in this case concluded that section 533.5, subdivision (b), applies to any criminal action, including federal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.