Co. of Siskiyou v. Super. Ct.

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 12, 2013C067252MCalifornia4,357 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/12/13 (unmodified opn. attached)

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

COUNTY OF SISKIYOU, C067252

Petitioner, (Super. Ct. No. 34201080000583) v.

ORDER MODIFYING

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SACRAMENTO OPINION

COUNTY,

[NO CHANGE IN Respondent; JUDGMENT]

ENVIRONMENTAL LAW FOUNDATION et al.,

Real Parties in Interest.

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on June 13, 2013, be modified as follows:

1. On page 8, the first sentence of the third full paragraph, “Siskiyou Superior Court” is changed to “Sacramento Superior Court,” so the sentence reads as follows:

The petition filed with the Sacramento Superior Court alleges Siskiyou failed in its duty under the public trust doctrine to monitor and

1 regulate groundwater extractions “that are not subject to the 1980 adjudication.”

2. On page 13, the first full paragraph, beginning with “Given that venue lies,” is revised to read as follows:

Even if venue lies…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.