Chin

Chin v. Tesla, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 3, 20253:24-cv-03873California331 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SHARON LANE CHIN, Case No. 24-cv-03873-AMO

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION TO STRIKE

TESLA, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 31 Defendant.

Before the Court is Defendant’s motion to strike Plaintiff Chin’s Notice of Supplemental Authority filed on February 28, 2025, ECF 30. See Strike Mot. (ECF 31) at 2. Plaintiff filed the Notice under Civil L.R. 7-3(d) to bring to the Court’s attention Rodriguez v. Packers Sanitation Services Ltd., LLC, No. D083400, 2025 WL 615064 (Cal. Ct. App. Feb. 26, 2025) in support of its opposition to Defendant’s motion to compel arbitration, ECF 25. Defendant argues that the Notice violates Civil Local Rule 7-3(d) because it includes argument regarding the supplemental authority at issue without first seeking Court approval. Id. The Court agrees that Chin’s Notice violates this district’s local rules, which require a party to provide no more than a citation and copy of the decision at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.